2 WEEKS FREE!    Circulation Center    Submit News    Submit Letter to Editor    Courier NIE    Submit Classified    Purchase Photos    Print Ads    Advertise    RSS Feeds
Advanced Search
(older than 14 days)
High 81°F
Low 56°F
 Business » Local
Article rated a
3
by
2
users
~ADVERTISING~
Advertise  |   Marketplace  |   Classifieds  |   Cars  |   Homes  |   Jobs
Sunday, March 2, 2008 6:02 AM CST
LS Power researching cleaner coal technology
By PAT KINNEY, Courier Business Editor
WATERLOO --- LS Power recently announced it is involved in a long-term research project aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions at coal-fired power plants, such as the one it is proposing for Waterloo.

LS Power, based in New Jersey with offices in St. Louis, along with several other power companies, is providing funding and LS Power has become a "strategic partner" in pilot plant initiative with the University of Texas at Austin.

The project involves "carbon capture" technology --- extracting carbon dioxide emissions from coal flue gas --- in a way "so it can be demonstrated on a commercial scale at coal-fired power plants," LS Power said in a release.

Carbon dioxide emissions resulting from petroleum and natural gas, represent 82 percent of total U.S. human-made greenhouse gas emissions, according to the National Energy Information Center. Greenhouse gases are believed by many to contribute to climate change and global warming, according to the National Climatic Data Center.

It is a long-term project, longer than the anticipated time frame for LS Power's proposed Waterloo plant to come on line, Waterloo power plant project manager Mark Milburn said.

But he said the project is aimed at demonstrating a way to make the technology "commercially viable, so it could be retrofitted to existing plants.

"Not just the new plants being proposed, but all the existing plants that have the largest portion of greenhouse gases," Milburn said, indicating those emissions would be lower at the Waterloo plant because it would be more modern and burn more efficiently.

"What we don't know is how long it is going to take," Milburn said. "We don't know what the economics look like. In the meantime, our customers want baseload power. We can't sit and wait on the research, but we can pursue both at the same time.

"The reason why we selected (to participate) is because it's a promising technology," Milburn said. "We have a real interest in finding solutions to this."

He said LS Power and other companies are putting up a total of about $1 million a year toward the project.

An opponent to the LS Power plant questioned the project's practicality and suggested it is a ruse.

"According to the leading experts on carbon capture and sequestration there is no reason to expect that plants built without CCS will be economically capable of retrofitting to use that technology --- which doesn't yet exist," said Mark Kresowik Iowa organizer of the Sierra Club's national coal campaign.

"The estimated costs are simply exorbitant," Kresowik said. "Energy efficiency and renewable energy are more than capable of reliably meeting projected demand at a lower cost than building a new coal plant, and they are far less expensive than any 'pie-in-the-sky' approach to 'someday' capture carbon dioxide."

Milburn said the first part the project would explore the most efficient way to extract the carbon dioxide from flue gas emissions; the next step would be how to dispense with it. He said the LS Power-funded research at Texas would complement other research initiatives to determine the most efficient way to do that. Company officials also have said they are researching wind and solar power and other renewable technologies.

LS Power's Waterloo proposal still requires state regulatory approvals.

Contact Pat Kinney at (319) 291-1484 or Pat.Kinney@wcfcourier.com .
Previous
     
 More Stories from Business » Local

Beary wrote on Mar 2, 2008 9:40 AM:

" In reference to th article in Sun. edition: LS Power researching cleaner coal technology. Mr. Milburn certainly feels he has won the battle over LS Power Co. coming here in reading his comments in this article. I hope we can continue to work hard to show all the necessary departments still left to veto this plant the horrific effects on our health and environment will occur.
This is just a new angle Mr. Milburn's company is using to pull support from people who are looking at the money. "

jcbr wrote on Mar 2, 2008 2:23 PM:

" l s power has been around for a while / now at once they want to capure carbon dioxide / what about years past they knew that / whos trying to snow who here ? did u notice nothing was said about mercury toxics / u think they care about your health ? if they did they would have made inprovements years ago / what they care about is dollars / the govorment cares about taxes and will look the other way / one hand greases the other plus pac money to elect who will be their yes people / if you live in a city had a wood stove and burned coal u can bet you would be forced to stop by your neighbors and your local city govorment / think about that / tnks jcbr "

hillbillytea wrote on Mar 3, 2008 4:55 AM:

" the artical clearly stated that the project will take years to complete and will not be availible when the plant goes on line.nice try, but milburn doesn't even know if it will work yet. "

majorhotrod1957 wrote on Mar 3, 2008 9:37 AM:

" Carbon dioxide does not directly impact your health. Carbon dioxide is not dirty. Get informed! Sounds like LS Power is stepping up to the plate, not only for us here but to be part of the global warming solution nationally. "

Hound wrote on Mar 3, 2008 1:21 PM:

" We already know that the technology that is going into the Waterloo plant is old fairly dirty technology. IF LS power was serious about anything other than making electricity for the Chicago suburbs and letting us Iowans deal with the pollution they would be at least looking into coal gassification vs just burning the stuff. Come on people, we can do soooooo much better!!! "

jcbr wrote on Mar 3, 2008 6:54 PM:

" dont fall for this later crap once built / theyll use every excuse in the book to stall / nothing is said about mercury / a 750 mega-watt plant has been put on hold in northern missouri / to see what washington dc does and the uniknown expense / why dont they build in wisc or ill where they re going to use the electricity / because inwisc and ill the rules and regs are strickter / us iowa hicks health dont matter / tnks jcbr "

hillbillytea wrote on Mar 3, 2008 8:59 PM:

" I'm not worried about Co2,I'm more worried about the trace elements like murcury,sulferdioxide,nitrates,arsnic,and in some cases radioactive matter.as it stands right now retrofiting a traditional plant with serquestering equipment would put that stuff back into the ground along with the Co2.the Epa tends to frown on that type of thing.in order to make it feasable they would have to filter the exhaust down to near 0% particulate matter which when said and done would put the cost in the same price range as the coal gasifycation plants. in the long run a coal gas plant would be cheaper to operate because you use less coal per megawatt of power.what coal gasdification does it removes the trace elements mentioned above durring the gasification process so all your left with is hydrogen and co2.after combustion the leftover Co2 is pumped into the ground to aid in the recovery of oil which make this technology a perfect fit for texas.however, serquestration technology is limited by subterrainian conditions and it may not be suitable for this area.See clean coal .org "

Due to the amount of spam and negative comments received, the Courier implement a registered-user system for participation in the comment portion of our site. In doing so, the Courier reserves the right to ban any user(s) at any time without notice if we feel they are not following the terms of agreement.
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
DISCLAIMER: The Courier provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. For a more in-depth explanation of our policy, please see our Rules of the Road. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.
NEWS | SPORTS | COMMUNITY | BUSINESS | ENTERTAINMENT | FEATURES | OPINIONS | OBITUARIES | CLASSIFIEDS | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | CARRIER PAGES
© 2008, Courier Communications, Waterloo, IA,
A subsidiary of Lee Enterprises