A late Monday morning Northwest Airlink flight prepares for takeoff at the Waterloo Regional Airport.
RICK CHASE / Courier Staff Photographer
~ADVERTISING~
Sunday, January 13, 2008 6:13 AM CST
Despite hype, NASA aviation report doesn't fly
By AMIE STEFFEN, Courier Staff Writer
WATERLOO --- A new NASA report on airline safety procedure almost has been overlooked by those in the air travel business locally, just as the Federal Aviation Administration calls 2008 "the safest period in aviation history."
Though the results of the National Aviation Operational Monitoring Service Project yielded startling new information about potential safety problems in air transportation, neither NASA nor the FAA will conclude there are any problems with the industry's method of tracking safety violations.
That's the main reason local air transport officials aren't concerned with the data, published Dec. 31. Waterloo Regional Airport Director Bradley Hagen said Friday he's more comfortable with the Federal Aviation Administration's method --- pilots must voluntarily report incidents within a 24-hour period --- than with a new NASA methodology, which relied on pilot recall over a two- to three-year period.
"These programs have been ongoing for many years," Hagen said. "The airports work closely with the FAA with programs specifically designed to reduce incursions at airports, and they have been for many years."
Locally, Hagen said Waterloo's airport is one of the safest as well.
"From our perspective, we haven't had any deviations for some time," he said, adding, "There's less activity, so less chance (of an incident)."
The Midwest region, known as ACE, has one of the lowest incursion rates in the country, according to the FAA. Out of 370 incidents reported in fiscal year 2007, only eight were attributed to ACE. And though the number of national incidents is a spike from 330 in 2006, ACE declined by nearly 50 percent.
Even before it was released, the FAA scoffed at NASA's NAOMS study because of its potential to contain repeat incidents from multiple respondents and the unusually large recall period.
"We're in the safest period in aviation history," said FAA spokeswoman Elizabeth Isham Cory.
Tim Newton, manager of Livingston Aviation in Waterloo, said his charter flight and maintenance business normally relies solely on FAA reports, and said there has been "no talk" regarding the NASA study. Eastern Iowa Airport Director of Marketing and Communications Pam Hinman noted she wasn't aware a study had been done.
The NAOMS project, which was conducted from April 2001 to December 2004, included interviews from more than 25,000 air carrier and general aviation personnel and asked a variety of questions relating to the type and frequency of incidents on the ground or in the air, including near misses.
On the heels of the NAOMS project but unrelated to it, the National Air Traffic Controllers Association released to the public Thursday a letter detailing what it calls "a national crisis in air transportation," which was sent to U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters and several congressional members last week.
The letter said almost 10 percent, or more than 1,000, of the already-depleted workforce in air traffic control is set to retire within the next year, and NATCA and the FAA are still locked in contract negotiations.
"We simply cannot safely handle the volume of air traffic that the FAA is currently demanding of us, let alone even attempt to do so with further staff losses in the weeks ahead," NATCA president Patrick Forrey wrote.
The FAA's Cory said the agency's hiring has surpassed the retirements, and she does not forsee any losses in air traffic control.
Contact Amie Steffen at (319) 291-1464 or amie.steffen@wcfcourier.com.
More Stories from News » Metro
If you would like to comment on this story, please log in with the form below. If you are not a registered user, please
CLICK HERE to sign up.
Due to the amount of spam and negative comments received, the Courier implement a registered-user system for participation in the comment portion of our site. In doing so, the Courier reserves the right to ban any user(s) at any time without notice if we feel they are not following the terms of agreement.
If you are not a registered user, please
CLICK HERE to sign up.

DISCLAIMER: The Courier provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. For a more in-depth explanation of our policy, please see our
Rules of the Road. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.
jtormey3 wrote on Jan 14, 2008 8:50 AM:
NASA Administrator Michael Griffin admitted that his agency’s release of the Survey’s data occurred late on New Year’s Eve. He then assured all of us that NASA “didn’t deliberately choose to release on the slowest news day of the year”. Griffin and NASA doth protest too much. The NASA survey data was issued in a redacted and deliberately-indecipherable manner. NASA previously sought to withhold the totality of this same data at least once before, when NASA rejected a prior AP FOIA request for it. Of course NASA sought to bury its New Year’s information-release amongst the champagne corks and the dropping ball. Griffin’s suggestion otherwise insults the intelligence of the American public. He insults me and he insults all of you.
In response, Quiet Rockland scheduled its written call discussed above, to arrive on what was one of the busiest back-to-work news days of the new year. 2008 will be the year that we mandate transparency of government. We cannot trust NASA management to communicate fairly or candidly to the American people. It is pathetic that this once-majestic agency of the Apollo era, no longer able to put astronauts on the Moon, and facing difficulty keeping a number of its recently-launched spacecraft intact, now cannot even terrestrially adopt precision or seriousness of purpose beyond that of Captain Anthony Nelson, Major Roger Healy, and Barbara Eden’s “Jeannie”. How dare NASA play space games with our safety!
The organizational ineptitude of NASA management is particularly threatening in light of yet another recent runway incident between two planes over the Holidays, once again at LAX, involving pilot miscommunications with an air traffic controller. NASA’s ostensible collaboration with its cousin-agency FAA towards concealing safety information from Americans, is confluent with the overall objective of the aero-mercantile complex to over-schedule flights and over-saturate our skies. With focus only upon the almighty buck, these un-checked rogue agencies continue to act at the expense of citizen and environmental safety and health. FAA’s “NY/NJ/PHL Airspace Redesign” is another component of this same harmful aviation special-interest plan. That Redesign must be and will be defeated by citizen outcry such as that voiced by “Quiet Rockland”, not to mention the pending federal court litigations and Congressional action against it, taken in the interests of making our skies and our homes safer.
NASA and Administrator Michael Griffin initially indicated that they had no intention to analyze or study, much less further report to the public or press upon the 16,000-plus pages of raw data in the “Air Safety Survey”. “Quiet Rockland” therefore has asked that Congress and the GAO: (1) audit and investigate NASA’s purposeful mishandling and cheeky and contemptuous New Year’s Eve issuance of purposefully-obfuscated and misleading data; and (2) order NASA to marshal and digest the Survey data and report to Congress, the GAO, and the media on it, in a fully-intelligible writing, within thirty calendar days after the January 2, 2008 date of Quiet Rockland’s written call. Given NASA’s proclivity to hide from the truth, Quiet Rockland suggested Groundhog Day as the most fitting date imaginable for that next report’s issuance.
Of the current Survey, Griffin was quoted as saying “It’s hard for me… to see any data the traveling public would care about or ought to care about”. Quiet Rockland has since assured Griffin and NASA that anecdotes extracted from the current Survey such as “pilot difficulties in talking to controllers in busy airspace’; air traffic control “capacity inadequate to handle traffic load”; “too many people on the frequency…causing a safety problem”; and perhaps worst of all, “pilots asleep” on the “flight deck”, are most definitely “cared about” by the traveling public - and will indubitably also be “cared about” by the many travelers who comprise Congress, the GAO, and the federal judiciary.
"