RSS Feeds
 |
|
|||||||||||||
Business » Local
Article rated a 0
by 0
users |
~ADVERTISING~
McDonald's demands end to antibiotic use
by Business Writer
CHICAGO (AP) -- Responding to rising concerns about antibiotics in livestock, McDonald's Corp. is telling its suppliers to phase out the use of the growth-promoting drugs in animals, a move advocacy groups say could help curb the practice worldwide.
The fast-food giant announced a new policy Thursday on the use of antibiotics in food animals after a year of consultations with environmental, science and consumer groups that have pushed for cutbacks.
The concern is that feeding antibiotics to chickens, cows and pigs so they'll grow bigger and more rapidly weakens the effect of antibiotics used in human medicine.
Under the four-page policy, McDonald's is telling its direct suppliers -- which provide most of its poultry and 20 percent of all its meat -- to phase out the use of antibiotics that promote growth in animals by the end of 2004. They will be asked to submit annual certifications testifying they are complying and face periodic audits.
Indirect suppliers, those providing beef and pork, also are being encouraged to stop the practice or risk losing business clout with one of the world's largest meat buyers. McDonald's said those seeking preferred status will have to certify compliance and maintain records of their antibiotic use.
The new policy does not prohibit the use of antibiotics to treat sick animals.
"As a company committed to social responsibility, we take seriously our obligation to understand the emerging science of antibiotic resistance and to work with our suppliers to foster real, tangible changes in our own supply community and hopefully beyond," said Frank Muschetto, a McDonald's senior vice president.
Environmental and consumer groups praised the company for being the first major fast-food chain to act, although the Union of Concerned Scientists, which has protested the use of antibiotics in meat production, said the policy should have gone further.
Environmental Defense, which was part of the coalition McDonald's formed on the increasingly controversial issue last year, and other organizations said they hope the policy will mark a turning point in the way U.S. farmers raise animals.
"McDonald's new policy demonstrates that reducing antibiotic use is both feasible and affordable," said Gwen Ruta, the advocacy group's program director.
Tyson Foods, a top direct supplier of poultry to McDonald's, also worked with McDonald's on the changes as a part of the coalition.
"Along with McDonald's, we believe it is critical for our company and our industry to utilize antibiotics in a responsible manner, which preserves their long-term effectiveness in both human and veterinary medicine," said Archie Schaffer, a senior vice president of the Springdale, Ark.-based Tyson.
But the Coalition for Animal Health, comprised of trade groups representing the animal production, animal feed and animal health products industries, disagreed with McDonald's contention that the new policy is science-based. It said that in Europe, where the use of antibiotics as growth promoters has been sharply lowered, incidences of disease have risen and antibiotics are being used increasingly to treat those ailments.
"We caution about actions not grounded in science," said spokesman Ron Phillips of the Animal Health Institute, a trade group for the makers of animal drugs. "As Europe is discovering, non-science based policies often have unintended consequences."
Becky Goldburg, a senior scientist with Environmental Defense, responded that the American Medical Association, the American Public Health Association and others have endorsed steps to reduce antibiotic use in animal feed.
The Union for Concerned Scientists said McDonald's should also have addressed antibiotics used for disease prevention and required third-party certification of its antibiotic monitoring program.
According to the scientists' group, an estimated 70 percent of antibiotics and related drugs in the United States are given to healthy pigs, cows and chickens to promote growth and prevent disease.
The fast-food giant announced a new policy Thursday on the use of antibiotics in food animals after a year of consultations with environmental, science and consumer groups that have pushed for cutbacks.
The concern is that feeding antibiotics to chickens, cows and pigs so they'll grow bigger and more rapidly weakens the effect of antibiotics used in human medicine.
Under the four-page policy, McDonald's is telling its direct suppliers -- which provide most of its poultry and 20 percent of all its meat -- to phase out the use of antibiotics that promote growth in animals by the end of 2004. They will be asked to submit annual certifications testifying they are complying and face periodic audits.
Indirect suppliers, those providing beef and pork, also are being encouraged to stop the practice or risk losing business clout with one of the world's largest meat buyers. McDonald's said those seeking preferred status will have to certify compliance and maintain records of their antibiotic use.
The new policy does not prohibit the use of antibiotics to treat sick animals.
"As a company committed to social responsibility, we take seriously our obligation to understand the emerging science of antibiotic resistance and to work with our suppliers to foster real, tangible changes in our own supply community and hopefully beyond," said Frank Muschetto, a McDonald's senior vice president.
Environmental and consumer groups praised the company for being the first major fast-food chain to act, although the Union of Concerned Scientists, which has protested the use of antibiotics in meat production, said the policy should have gone further.
Environmental Defense, which was part of the coalition McDonald's formed on the increasingly controversial issue last year, and other organizations said they hope the policy will mark a turning point in the way U.S. farmers raise animals.
"McDonald's new policy demonstrates that reducing antibiotic use is both feasible and affordable," said Gwen Ruta, the advocacy group's program director.
Tyson Foods, a top direct supplier of poultry to McDonald's, also worked with McDonald's on the changes as a part of the coalition.
"Along with McDonald's, we believe it is critical for our company and our industry to utilize antibiotics in a responsible manner, which preserves their long-term effectiveness in both human and veterinary medicine," said Archie Schaffer, a senior vice president of the Springdale, Ark.-based Tyson.
But the Coalition for Animal Health, comprised of trade groups representing the animal production, animal feed and animal health products industries, disagreed with McDonald's contention that the new policy is science-based. It said that in Europe, where the use of antibiotics as growth promoters has been sharply lowered, incidences of disease have risen and antibiotics are being used increasingly to treat those ailments.
"We caution about actions not grounded in science," said spokesman Ron Phillips of the Animal Health Institute, a trade group for the makers of animal drugs. "As Europe is discovering, non-science based policies often have unintended consequences."
Becky Goldburg, a senior scientist with Environmental Defense, responded that the American Medical Association, the American Public Health Association and others have endorsed steps to reduce antibiotic use in animal feed.
The Union for Concerned Scientists said McDonald's should also have addressed antibiotics used for disease prevention and required third-party certification of its antibiotic monitoring program.
According to the scientists' group, an estimated 70 percent of antibiotics and related drugs in the United States are given to healthy pigs, cows and chickens to promote growth and prevent disease.
 |
 |
More Stories from Business » Local
D.C. Firm Helps Organize WorldCom ProtestMcDonald's demands end to antibiotic useBill faces tough opposition against eased media rules
Due to the amount of spam and negative comments received, the Courier implement a registered-user system for participation in the comment portion of our site. In doing so, the Courier reserves the right to ban any user(s) at any time without notice if we feel they are not following the terms of agreement.
DISCLAIMER: The Courier provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. For a more in-depth explanation of our policy, please see our Rules of the Road. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.
~ADVERTISEMENT~
NEWS |
SPORTS |
COMMUNITY |
BUSINESS |
ENTERTAINMENT |
FEATURES |
OPINIONS |
OBITUARIES |
CLASSIFIEDS |
PRIVACY POLICY |
CONTACT US |
CARRIER PAGES
|